Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Donna Hill v. James Barnacle, et al
as 17-2448
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
RIECO v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2017cv00553
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
ROBERT GILMORE, DIALEASANDRO, ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Donna Hill
as 17-1481
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DONNA M. HILL
Defendant - Respondent:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
Nominal Respondent:
NORA B. FISCHER
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2016cv02548
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jones
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Shirley Smeal, John Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Garman et al
as 3:2016cv02487
Plaintiff:
Michael Nelson
Defendant:
Mark Garman, Marrisa Houser, Tim Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donna Hill v. James Barnacle, et al
as 15-3815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
Escalera v. Harry et al
as 1:2015cv02132
Plaintiff:
Dominic Escalera
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Becker, James Barnacle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DiPietro v. The Department of Corrections and Its Employees Listed Herein et al
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Nicodemo DiPietro
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Its Employees Listed Herein, Daniel Mienert, John T. Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REID-DOUGLAS et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00533
Plaintiff:
STEVEN REID-DOUGLAS, THOMAS SCOTT and DALIYL MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL , JAMES BARNACLE , DAVID PITKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Hallman v. Robert Stitt, et al
as 15-1796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT HALLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERT STITT
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, RAYMOND LAWLER, MAJOR WAKEFIELD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
