Cases 1 - 10 of 33
United States of America v. Blankenship
as 24-1850
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JEFFERY JAMES BLANKENSHIP
Newman v. Underhill, et al.
as 24-1493
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEWMAN
Defendant:
TODD UNDERHILL, Deputy, JONATHAN BARMER, Deputy, LAUREN LAIDLAW and others
BLANKENSHIP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20411
Petitioner:
BO JAMES BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bentz et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Defendant:
Taishan Gypsum Co. Ltd., Shandong Taihe Dongxin Co. Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bentz, Scott Spires, James Blankenship and others
Blankenship v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02448
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Blankenship
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blankenship v. Saul
as 4:2020cv01887
Plaintiff:
James Blankenship and James Brian Blankenship
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BLANKENSHIP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv89262
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLANKENSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLANKENSHIP II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv35496
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLANKENSHIP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BLANKENSHIP v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv15775
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLANKENSHIP
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
