Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Gillaspie v. Huntsville CGO et al
as 4:2018cv03249
Plaintiff:
Zachary Don Gillaspie
Defendant:
Cpt. Hazlewood, Lori Davis, University of Texas Medical Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillaspie v. Travis T et al
as 4:2017cv02742
Plaintiff:
Zachary Don Gillaspie
Defendant:
Travis T, Staci Crowley and James Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillaspie v. Travis T et al
as 3:2017cv01911
Plaintiff:
Zachary Don Gillaspie
Defendant:
Travis T, Staci Crowley and James Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ha'Keem et al v. Mesojedec et al
as 0:2016cv00348
Plaintiff:
Maikijah Ha'Keem, Roy Hughes, James Booker and others
Defendant:
Chad Mesojedec , Troy Basaraba , Elizabeth Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Three Maurice Product Sales Company v. Advance Construction, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00385
Plaintiff:
Three Maurice Product Sales Company
Defendant:
Advance Construction, Inc. , James Booker , Vanessa Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Booker v. O'Conner et al
as 1:2015cv50052
Plaintiff:
Willie James Booker
Defendant:
Margie O'Conner, Bruce Rauner and Ronald L. Pirrello
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Booker v. O'Conner et al
as 3:2015cv50052
Plaintiff:
Willie James Booker
Defendant:
Margie O'Conner, Bruce Rauner and Ronald L. Pirrello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCray v. Williams et al
as 1:2015cv00091
Defendant:
Richard Aiello, F. Beitia, James Booker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Harley McCray
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Booker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2013cv24557
Plaintiff:
James Booker
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Booker v. Mapes
as 4:2013cv00310
Plaintiff:
Baron Marquis James Booker
Defendant:
Terry Mapes, Larry Lipscomb and Scott Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
