Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Eaton v. Weyford Health Care Service et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Eaton, II
Defendant:
Weyford Health Care Service, Warden Galloway and Warden Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Eaton, III and James Calvin Eaton, II
Defendant:
Anthony Wills and C/O Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv04518
Plaintiff:
JAMES C TATE and JAMES CALVIN TATE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
In Re Barnes
as 1:2023cv00064
Petitioner:
James Calvin Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Breeden v. USA
as 7:2023cv00913
Petitioner:
James Calvin Breeden
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BEVERLY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
JAMES CALVIN BEVERLY, JR.
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Farrar v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv02776
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Farrar
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. James Brooks
as 22-7062
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES CALVIN BROOKS
Howard v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Howard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. James Patterson
as 22-30088
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES CALVIN PATTERSON, AKA James Calvin Patterson II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
