Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Tyson v Waterman et al
as 4:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Thomas Waterman and Darrel Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tyson, Sr. v. Rebecca Ebinger, et al
as 22-3380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, Kimberly Reynolds and Kevin Ray Cmelik
Tyson v. Macaek et al
as 4:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Paul Macaek, Amy Divine and Bruce Ingrham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tyson, Sr. v. Iowa Pen. Educational Dept., et al
as 22-3227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Iowa State Penitentiary Educational Department and Madison Carlson
Tyson v. Goodgame Ebinger et al
as 4:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, Kim Reynolds and Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyson v. Iowa State Penitentiary Educational Department et al
as 4:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Iowa State Penitentiary Educational Department and Madison Carlson
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tyson, Sr. v. Rebecca Ebinger
as 22-2490
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger
James Tyson, Sr. v. Iowa State Penitentiary, et al
as 22-2274
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Iowa State Penitentiary and Southeastern Community College, Pell Grant Department
Tyson v. Goodgame Ebinger
as 4:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Tyson, Sr. v. Robert Johnson, et al
as 22-2029
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Robert Johnson, Warden and Scott County District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
