Cases 1 - 10 of 27
CROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14896
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crow v. Rasmussen et al
as 0:2023cv02403
Plaintiff:
Johnny James Crow
Defendant:
Eric Lee Rasmussen, Andrew Timothy Ruden and Minneapolis, City of, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crow et al v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
James Crow and Megan Crow
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LaFond Sr. v. Denton County et al
as 4:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
David LaFond Sr.
Defendant:
Denton County, Throckmorton County, Denton County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Crow v. Hacker
as 4:2022cv01379
Petitioner:
James Crow
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CROWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv48584
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv02388
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROW
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03962
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES CROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLAYBROOK et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03183
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR AMOS, LANORMA MURDOCK, PHILLIP BAYS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Claybrook et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02144
Plaintiff:
Arthur Amos, Lanorma Murdock, Phillip Bays and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
