Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Morales v. Deloach, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Lee Nelly Morales
Defendant:
Willie James Deloach, Jr. and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Deloach et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv06051
Plaintiff:
James Deloach and Linda Rae Deloach
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deloach et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv00981
Plaintiff:
James Deloach and Linda Rae Deloach
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TLUS Sam Red HDB Owner, LLD v. James Deloach et al
as 2:2019cv00124
Plaintiff:
TLUS Sam Red HDB Owner, LLD
Defendant:
James Deloach and Does 1-25, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hickman v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00352
Plaintiff:
Edward Philpot Hickman
Defendant:
Karla Jones, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheatham et al v. Thomas et al
as 4:2014cv01952
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cheatham , Mark Duke , James Edwards and others
Defendant:
Kim Thomas , James Deloach , Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howlet v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv01077
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Howlet
Defendant:
Carter F. Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Bentley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00808
Plaintiff:
Michael Mays
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Davenport et al
as 4:2014cv00240
Plaintiff:
Allan Williams
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.