Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ROSS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18426
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN ROSS and THE ESTATE OF CONNIE LEVEEN ROSS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DORN v. BUDWICK et al
as 2:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES DEAN and THOMAS JAMES DORN
Defendant:
MARISSA BUDWICK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, OTHER UNNAMED FBI AGENTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
VIVIAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2017cv00179
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN VIVIAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BURNS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2014cv01485
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN BURNS
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RECOVERCARE, LLC v. DEAN
as 2:2014cv06193
Plaintiff:
RECOVERCARE, LLC
Defendant:
JAMES DEAN , STEPHEN RAKUS and FREEDOM MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAHAMI et al v. THE CITY OF ELIZABETH et al
as 2:2011cv01953
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD R. RAHAMI , MOHAMMAD K. RAHAMI, JR. and MOHAMMAD Q. RAHAMI
Defendant:
THE CITY OF ELIZABETH , THE ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT , J. CORREIA and others
Cross_claimant:
THE CITY OF ELIZABETH , JAMES COSGROVE , RONALD SIMON and others
Cross_defendant:
JAMES DEAN MCDERMOTT , JOSEPH WASSELL , THE CITY OF ELIZABETH and others
Counter_claimant:
V. TROPEANO
Counter_defendant:
JOSEPH WASSELL , THE CITY OF ELIZABETH , JAMES COSGROVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TROWELL v. SOUTH et al
as 2:2010cv02599
Plaintiff:
SALAHDIN TROWELL
Defendant:
JAMES DEAN SOUTH, I. MARCO RODRIGUEZ, F.J. LARAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
