Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bears Towing & Recovery of Ouachita Inc v. Team Hosey Express L L C et al
as 3:2023cv01785
Not Yet Classified:
BM2 Freight Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bears Towing & Recovery of Ouachita Inc
Defendant:
Team Hosey Express, LLC, United Specialty Insurance Co, Pennsylvania Manufacturers Association Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Wilson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
as 2:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
James Dean Wilson
Respondent:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walton v. Fagioli, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00319
Plaintiff:
James Dean Walton
Defendant:
Fagioli, Inc. and ABC Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2017cv02905
Petitioner:
James Dean Parker
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Davis
as 4:2017cv03136
Petitioner:
James Dean Parker
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. James Coker
as 17-60045
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES DEAN COKER
Smith et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 2:2016cv14961
Plaintiff:
James Dean Smith and Sarah Indian Smith
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Burton et al v. Myrick et al
as 2:2016cv00405
Plaintiff:
Randy Burton , James Dean , Jaime Daniel Escobar and others
Defendant:
Isha Myrick, Paul Myrick, Jr. and Robert Myrick
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Coker v. USA
as 3:2016cv00504
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
James Dean Coker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mathis et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2015cv00138
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Mathis, James Dean Mathis and Tammy M. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
