Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Banks v. DeLoach et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2008cv00910
Plaintiff:
Christopher Banks
Defendant:
James DeLoach, Warden Daniels and Captain Crow
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Esco v. Daniels et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00831
Plaintiff:
Tito T. Davis and Billy Dwight Esco
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Kathy Holt, Richard Allen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gay v. DeLoach et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2008cv00561
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant:
James DeLoach and Cathy Holt
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Allen et al
as 4:2008cv01151
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Terrance McDonnell, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perez v. McWhorter et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00400
Plaintiff:
Francisca Perez
Defendant:
David K. McWhorter, Allen Millican and James DeLoach
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cameron v. Deloach et al
as 3:2008cv00035
Petitioner:
Jimmy Frank Cameron
Respondent:
James Deloach and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cameron v. Deloach et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2007cv01049
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Frank Cameron
Defendant:
James Deloach and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Allen et al
as 4:2007cv02099
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Richard Allen, James DeLoach, Steve Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Allen et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2007cv00885
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Richard Allen, James DeLoach, Steve Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Deloach et al (INMATE1)(CONSENT)
as 2:2007cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jasmon Corde Johnson
Defendant:
James Deloach, James Deloach, Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
