Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Doe et al v. 47th St. Food, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
John Doe and James Doe
Defendant:
47th St. Food, Inc. doing business as Blake & Todd, 53rd St. Food, LLC doing business as Blake & Todd, 52 Van Food Corp. doing business as Blake & Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rice v. The City of New York
as 21-2942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Geoffrey Rice and Ophelia Rice
Defendant / Appellee:
The City of New York, The City of New York Police Department, NYPD Sgt. John Doe Goldstein and others
Kothari v. Armenta et al
as 1:2021cv06343
Plaintiff:
Prafulla C. Kothari
Defendant:
Evelyn Armenta and Jame Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Pisani
as 21-2847
Plaintiff / Appellee:
James Doe, Mother Doe, John Doe and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Gladys Pisani, Daniel McAnaspie and Joseph Joudy
Kothari v. Armenta et al
as 1:2021cv09161
Plaintiff:
Prafulla C. Kothari
Defendant:
Evelyn Armenta and Jame Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargrove v. Ackerman
as 3:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hargrove and Clifton Powell
Defendant:
Jason Ackerman, Amanda, Paul Amble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agramonte v. Smith et al
as 9:2021cv00866
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Agramonte
Defendant:
B. Smith, Jame Doe and Carl J. Koenigsmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2021cv02154
Plaintiff:
VAY GORDON
Defendant:
Police Officer JAMES E. BIGGS, CITY OF NEW YORK, Police Officer John Iodice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Druss v. Town of Clarkstown et al
as 7:2020cv06341
Defendant:
Shirley Rose, Anthony Muscatella, James Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Druss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Doe v. Bemer
as 3:2020cv01103
Plaintiff:
James Doe
Defendant:
Bruce J Bemer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
