Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Richardson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2017cv03747
Plaintiff:
James E. Richardson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brownell et al v. Richardson et al
as 1:2017cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Brownell and Calvin H. Durham
Defendant:
James E. Richardson and New England Motor Freight, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Michael R. Brownell and Calvin H. Durham
Counter_claimant:
James E. Richardson and New England Motor Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Central Mutual Insurance Company v. Fitzhugh et al
as 3:2013cv00720
Plaintiff:
Central Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kristen Fitzhugh, Judith Fitzhugh, Alisa Piar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
LAUER et al v. JR STRUTS SUPPORT, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv01107
Plaintiff:
JOE COAR, INDIANA/KENTUCKY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, MIKE LAUER and others
Defendant:
JR STRUTS SUPPORT, INC. and JAMES E. RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv02728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Robinson, et al v. Eastman Kodak
as 6:2002cv06204
Plaintiff:
Lawrence T Heinsler, Stephen M. Ellis, Thomas L. Braden and others
Special Master:
Esq. Steven V Modica
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
