Cases 121 - 130 of 243
Rennie Hurtado v. Dave Runnels, et al
as 08-56761
Petitioner - Appellant:
RENNIE HURTADO
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVE L. RUNNELS, Warden and JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Clarke Lowe v. James Tilton
as 08-56737
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARKE SHELDON LOWE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Francisco Manzano v. James Tilton
as 08-56732
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCISCO MANZANO
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Chhouy Chhoun v. Kathy Power, et al
as 08-56699
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHHOUY CHHOUN
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHY MENDOZA POWER, Warden, JAMES E. TILTON and JERRY BROWN, Attorney General of State of California
Ortiz v. Tilton
as 3:2006cv01752
Petitioner:
Marcos Antonio Ortiz
Respondent:
James E Tilton and Edmund G. Brown
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher Van Horn v. James Tilton
as 08-56524
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. VAN HORN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director, CDCR
Darrell Tittle, Jr. v. James Tilton
as 08-56492
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL JAMES TITTLE, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
James Bottomley v. James Tilton
as 08-56489
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES C. BOTTOMLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Gary Masse v. James Davis, et al
as 08-16961
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY J. MASSE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES DAVIS, JAMES E. TILTON, M. MARTEL and others
Michael Tilton v. James Tilton, et al
as 08-16923
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. TILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and KEN CLARK, Warden, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison at Corcoran
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
