Cases 81 - 90 of 243
LaMaar Crowder v. James Tilton
as 09-56000
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAMAAR RASHID CROWDER
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Kenneth Schultz v. James Tilton
as 09-55998
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH HARRELL SCHULTZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Dion Wilmont v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 09-55988
Petitioner - Appellant:
DION WILMONT
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT M. KERNAN, Warden and JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary of CDC
Javier Garnica v. James Tilton
as 09-55915
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAVIER HUERTA GARNICA
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Theodore O'Dell Wilson v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv04186
Petitioner:
Theodore O'Dell Wilson
Respondent:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., James E. Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Kou Cha v. James Tilton, et al
as 09-16137
Petitioner - Appellant:
KOU CHA
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON and A. K. SCRIBNER
David Leon v. James Yates, et al
as 09-15897
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL LEON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES and JAMES E. TILTON, Director, CDOC
David Terry v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 09-15813
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LEE TERRY
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MULE CREEK STATE PRISON and JAMES E. TILTON, Director of Corrections
Lawrence Remsen v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 09-15756
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE REMSEN
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JAMES E. TILTON, JAMES DAVIS and others
Demontray Thompson v. James Tilton
as 09-55571
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEMONTRAY THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director, Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
