Cases 61 - 70 of 411
Glenn L. Boyd Jr. v. Domingo Uribe Jr.
as 5:2010cv01648
Defendant:
Alameida, R Allen, S Barringer and others
Petitioner:
Glenn L Boyd, Jr.
Respondent:
Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Alfredo Arredondo v. James Tilton
as 10-56665
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALFREDO RAIGOSA ARREDONDO
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director
Phillip Sanders v. James Tilton
as 10-56652
Petitioner - Appellant:
PHILLIP C. SANDERS
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Warden
Ansar El Muhammad v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-17286
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, AKA Cheval Wright
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, S. ORNASKI, JAMES E. TILTON and others
Loran Alexandre v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-17209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORAN MICHA ALEXANDRE, AKA Michael Alexander
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California, JAMES E. TILTON, Secretary California Department of Corrections, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PAROLE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION and others
Anthony Robinson v. Anthony Lamarque, et al
as 10-17186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY L. ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY A. LAMARQUE, Warden, M. MONTEIRO, Acting Associate Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, P. MANDEVILLE, Correctional Captain and others
Alfaro v. Tilton et al
as 5:2010cv04416
Plaintiff:
Cesar Alfaro
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, G. Lewis, D. Higgerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kun Peng v. James Tilton, et al
as 10-17024
Petitioner - Appellant:
KUN S. PENG
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON, Director CDC and BEN CURRY, Warden
Bibbs v. Tilton et al
as 4:2010cv03999
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
James E. Tilton, Greg Lewis, Bryan Kingston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew Hill v. James Tilton
as 10-16883
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES E. TILTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
