Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Thomas v. Peterson
as 1:2017cv00371
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Eric Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. White
as 7:2017cv00817
Petitioner:
James Earl Thomas
Respondent:
Beverely White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Zofra et al
as 7:2017cv00719
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Zynnia Zofra and Beverly White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
James Thomas v. Yolanda Smiley, et al
as 16-16836
Defendant:
ALEX MAULDIN, is sued in his individual and official position as janitor for ALCO Management Inc AMO, DY SMITH, is sued in her individual and official capacity, as police officer, YOLANDA SMILEY, is sued in her individual and official position as Manager for ALCO Management Inc, AMO and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES EARL THOMAS
James Thomas v. Yolanda Smiley, et al
as 16-16836
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
YOLANDA SMILEY, is sued in her individual and official position as Manager for ALCO Management Inc, AMO, ALEX MAULDIN, is sued in his individual and official position as janitor for ALCO Management Inc AMO, DY SMITH, is sued in her individual and official capacity, as police officer and others
In re: James Thomas
as 16-15290
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EARL THOMAS
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas v. Smiley et al
as 2:2016cv00584
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Yolanda Smiley, Alex Mauldin, DY Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Wright et al
as 2:2015cv01496
Plaintiff:
James Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Ann Wright, Valencia Green, Carleta Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
In re: James Thomas
as 15-12775
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES EARL THOMAS
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00042
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
