Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Lloyd & Mousilli, PLLC v. Egan
as 4:2023cv04094
Plaintiff:
Lloyd & Mousilli, PLLC
Defendant:
James Egan
Andrew Moret v. State of Oregon, et al
as 22-35037
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW GUY MORET
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, OSH, CINDY B. and others
In Re: Petition of James Egan, as titled owner of and for one 2010 35' Sea Ray Boats 350 Sundancer bearing hull identification number SERT3241D010, her engines, tackle, and appurtenances, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
as 6:2021cv01986
Petitioner:
James Egan and Petition of James Egan
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31301
Moret v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2021cv00477
Defendant:
Channing Bennett, State of Oregon, James Egan and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moret
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rote v. Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States et al
as 3:2019cv01988
Defendant:
ELIZABETH WEISHAUPL, Oregon State Bar, SUSIE NORBY and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY C. ROTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROTE v. COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT AND DISABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2019cv01299
Defendant:
ELIZABETH WEISHAUPL, OREGON STATE BAR, SUSIE NORBY and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ROTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Egan v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6580
Defendant:
ROANOKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and STEVEN A. MCGRAW, Clerk
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES EGAN, SR.
Stacy v. Egan et al
as 6:2018cv03192
Plaintiff:
Michael Stacy
Defendant:
James Egan, Rod Hackathorn and Christ Hadley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
