Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Kimery v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Gibson et al
as 4:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sammie H Parker
Defendant:
James Gibson, Anthony Jackson, Brandon Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Sifuentes et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christian Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes, Marquis Taylor, L Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Gary L Conley
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kent v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Marvin Kent
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Straugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Compton et al
as 4:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Antiona Lee Phillips
Defendant:
Donald Compton, Pierce, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatmon v. Gibson et al
as 4:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Rolandis Chatmon
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon Carroll, Roosevelt Barden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
Gregory L Hamilton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz v. Gibson et al
as 4:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Tony Ruiz
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon Carroll, A Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Gibson et al
as 4:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Myron Newjean Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
James Gibson, Brandon Carroll and Gloria Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
