Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MONTOOTH et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv09803
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA MONTOOTH and JAMES GILLILAND
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilliland v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as TXN/3:13-cv-03736
Plaintiff:
James Gilliland
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Gilliland v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv03736
Plaintiff:
James Gilliland
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bacchus Management Group, LLC v. Talisker Canyons (WA Dakota), LLC
as 3:2011cv00987
Plaintiff:
Bacchus Management Group, LLC
Defendant:
Talisker Canyons (WA Dakota), LLC
Mediator:
James Gilliland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
United States of America, Ex. Rel. et al v. Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv02529
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Ex. Rel. and Randy Carver
Defendant:
Factor Nutrition Labs, LLC and Vital Basics, Inc.
Mediator:
James Gilliland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Pernod Ricard Mexico, S.A. de C.V. et al v. Tequila Tazon, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00968
Plaintiff:
Pernod Ricard Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Pernod Ricard Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Pernod Ricard Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and others
Defendant:
Tequila Tazon, Inc. and American Wine Distributors, Inc.
Counter-claimant:
Tequila Tazon, Inc.
Counter-defendant:
Pernod Ricard Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Pernod Ricard Mexico, S.A. de C.V., Pernod Ricard USA, LLC and others
Mediator:
James Gilliland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
