Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund et al v. Famous Lubricants, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund and Charles A. Whobrey
Defendant:
Vaughn Hapeman, Famous Lubricants, Inc. and James Goodale
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Goodall v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02273
Plaintiff:
Robert James Goodall, Jr.
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Goodall v. Vega
as 3:2010cv00733
Petitioner:
James Goodall
Interested Party:
Andres R. Rappard
Respondent:
Valorie J. Vega
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodall v. Donat et al
as 3:2010cv00673
Defendant:
James Baca, Bill Donat and Chuck Horn
Plaintiff:
James Goodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Goodall v. State of Nevada, et al
as 10-16934
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES GOODALL
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA and WILLIAM DONAT
Wagner v. City of Oakland et al
as 1:2009cv00854
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Wagner
Defendant:
City of Oakland, Arnold F. Phillips, J. Joesph Curran and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wagner v. City of Oakland et al
as 1:2008cv03390
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Wagner
Defendant:
City of Oakland, James L. Sherbin, Robert M. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Goodall aka James Goodall, Jr. v. State Of Nevada et al
as 3:2007cv00629
Petitioner:
James Goodall
Respondent:
State Of Nevada and William Donat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
