Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Henley v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01629
Plaintiff:
James Henley
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
HENLEY et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18726
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENLEY and THE ESTATE OF RUTH HENLEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henley v. American Homes for Rent Properties Ten LLC
as 1:2020cv05509
Plaintiff:
James Henley
Defendant:
American Homes for Rent Properties Ten LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henley v. Diamondback Energy, Inc
as 7:2020cv00045
Plaintiff:
James Henley
Defendant:
Diamondback Energy, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Henley v. Williams
as 2:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
James Henley
Defendant:
C. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENLEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2017cv01034
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HENLEY v. MONROE
as 1:2016cv02423
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENLEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL MONROE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
HENLEY v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv00715
Defendant:
AMY CLARK, SHARON HAWK and BRUCE LEMMON
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENLEY v. HARDESTY-MONTGOMERY et al
as 1:2015cv00845
Defendant:
ASHLEY HARDESTY-MONTGOMERY and BETH HARDESTY-MONTGOMERY
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Henley et al
as 2:2015mc50533
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Henley, Timothy Cromer and Ricardo Hearn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
