Cases 1 - 10 of 15
HILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv02806
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hilton v. Miller
as 9:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
James Hilton
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71760
Plaintiff:
JAMES HILTON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv15121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Nicholas King, et al v. Town of Danville, Indiana, et al
as 18-1466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS A. KING and JENNIFER L. KING
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF DANVILLE, INDIANA, HENDRICKS COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, Unknown agents in their individual capacities, JAMES HILTON, Detective, in his official capacity and others
KING et al v. TOWN OF DANVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2015cv00252
Defendant:
JAMES HILTON and TOWN OF DANVILLE, INDIANA
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNNE KING and NICHOLAS ANDREW KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hilton v. Katsnelson et al
as 3:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
James Hilton and USA
Defendant:
Arkady Katsnelson and Wayne H. Carver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilton v. Murphy
as 3:2012cv01292
Petitioner:
James Hilton
Respondent:
Peter Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gary Caudill, et al v. Sears Transition Pay Plan, et al
as 11-1602
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GARY CAUDILL, SYLVESTOR J. DEROSA, STEVEN D. FORD, SR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SEARS TRANSITION PAY PLAN, SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, SEARS HOME IMPROVEMENT PRODUCTS, INCORPORATED and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
