Cases 1 - 10 of 147
WAGGONER v. DEFUNIAK SPRINGS CITY et al

as 3:2022cv07858
Plaintiff:
PAUL DOUGLAS WAGGONER
Defendant:
DEFUNIAK SPRINGS CITY, JAMES HURLEY, MICHAEL A ADKINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Marshall v. Parson et al

as 4:2021cv01500
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamont Marshall
Defendant:
Michael L. Parson, Ann L. Precythe, Jeff Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hurley
as 0:2020cv62057
Defendant:
Harrison James Hurley, III and Harry James Hurley, III
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jones
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Stevens v. Parsons et al

as 4:2020cv00693
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, James Hurley, Michael Parsons and others
Plaintiff:
Dusty Allen Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans et al
as 2:2020cv01318
Defendant:
The Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans, Archdiocese of New Orleans Indemnity, Inc., Father James Hurley and others
Plaintiff:
B.B. Doe
HURLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53431
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HURLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KILGO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32198
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES HURLEY KILGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00266
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JAMES HURLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HURLEY et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03127
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PAYNE, BRANDON GREGORY, STEVEN ATTIG and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hurley et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02066
Plaintiff:
William Payne, Brandon Gregory, Steven Attig and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.