Cases 31 - 40 of 982
Hansen v. Johnson
as 23-6821
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS HANSEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMES JOHNSON, Current Acting Superintendent
Blackburn v. Lubbock FBI et al
as 5:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Amy Louise Blackburn
Defendant:
Lubbock FBI, John Waters, Sr., John Waters, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20838
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gancarz et al v. Capito
as 2:2023cv01113
Defendant:
David Alan Capito, II and Vyacheslav Arkangelskiy
Plaintiff:
Paul Gancarz, Daniel Turetchi, Colton Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Schukar et al v. Kenosha County et al
as 2:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
alyssa schukar and scott olson
Defendant:
Kenosha County, David G Beth, City of Kenosha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burkill, LLC v. James Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv04395
Plaintiff:
Burkill, LLC
Defendant:
James Johnson and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
McMullan v. Leffler et al
as 4:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Artez McMullan
Defendant:
Bryan Leffler, James Johnson, Paul Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Gantt v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gantt
Defendant:
James Johnson, Larry Winegardner, Thomas Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Misner et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Johnson
Defendant:
Michael Misner, Officer Phillip Briski, Officer Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
