Cases 41 - 50 of 226
KING v. MYLAN N.V. et al
as 1:2021cv15430
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING
Defendant:
MYLAN N.V., MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv37612
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wershe v. City of Detroit et al
as 4:2021cv11686
Plaintiff:
Richard Wershe, Jr
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Jasper William, Kevin Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KING v. AIKENS et al
as 5:2021cv00215
Defendant:
DOCTOR AIKENS, DOCTOR LANE ULRICH and MEDICAL DIRECTOR JENNIFER MASON
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq00583
Plaintiff:
James King and Gayle King
Defendant:
Chevron USA Inc, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King-Holmes v. Endeavor Business Media, LLC
as 3:2021cv00286
Defendant:
Endeavor Business Media, LLC
Plaintiff:
James King-Holmes
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
(PC) Duque v. Alcazar et al
as 2:2021cv00523
Defendant:
Manny Alcazar, Mike Hernandez, Jessie James King and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Duque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Gootkin et al
as 2:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
James King
Defendant:
Assoc. Warden Godfrey, Lt. Postma, Brian R. Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04102
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Massey et al
as 3:2020cv00415
Defendant:
Felicia Rolland, Dane Barnum, Morgan Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
