Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Couch v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Rickey Eugene Couch
Defendant:
David Gutierrez, Rissie Owens and James LaFavers, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Rickey Eugene Couch
Defendant:
David Gutierrez, Rissie Owens and James LaFavers, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bowers et al
as 3:2022cv01882
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jones
Defendant:
R Bowers, D Wonders, J Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Defendant:
James Lafavers, James Randall Smith, Jeffery Marton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Lafavers et al
as 4:2021cv01311
Plaintiff:
Michael Henderson
Defendant:
James Lafavers, James Randall Smith, Jeffery Marton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. GUTIERREZ et al
as 4:2021cv01641
Respondent:
DAVID GUTIERREZ, Brian Long, LINDA MOLINA and others
Petitioner:
Quintin Phillippe Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Anna Estevez, John Smithee, United States Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Garcia v. Jones et al
as 4:2018cv04503
Defendant:
Fred Solis, Brian Long, David Gutierrez and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Mims v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2018cv00137
Defendant:
Ramon Gonzales, Marsha Moberley and James Lafavers
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Mims
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Young v. David Gutierrez, et al
as 18-70023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID GUTIERREZ, JAMES LAFAVERS, BRIAN LONG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
