Cases 1 - 7 of 7
LYMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv28848
Plaintiff:
JAMES LYMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lyman v. Minert
as 2:2021cv00756
Petitioner:
Tyler James Lyman
Respondent:
Michelle Minert
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The NYS Law Enforcement Officers Union Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO et al v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01525
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Beck, Jr., Laura Cestaro, Gerald Gallo and others
Defendant:
Caroline W. Ahl, Andrew M. Cuomo, Thomas P. DiNapoli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
In re: James Lyman
as 10-10090
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES LYMAN
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JAN BUETTGEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Consolidated Plaintiff - Respondent:
JOHN HEFFNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and ALAN GOLDBERG, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
KATHERINE J. HARLESS
Movant - Respondent:
KENTUCKY STATE DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION TRUST FUND
Elder, et al. vs. Bay City, et al.
as 1:2009cv14868
Plaintiff:
Eugene Elder, Sr and Eugene Elder, Jr
Defendant:
Bay City and James Lyman
Alexander et al v. Guidant et al
as 3:2007cv00518
Plaintiff:
Edward Alexander, Elsie Argurieo, Antonio Barela and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., Guidant Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yang, et al v. MAGEC, et al
as 1:2001cv05437
Plaintiff:
Pahog Yang , Elaine Yang , Tzong Cha and others
Defendant:
Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium, Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium Operations Commanders as of 10/98 4/00 11/00, County of Fresno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
