Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Jacqueline Alexander, et al v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 17-55828
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JACQUELINE ALEXANDER, TIM ALEXANDER, VICTORIA ANTHONY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
PRODUCT LIABILITY ADVISORY COUNCIL
Jacqueline Alexander, et al v. Bayer Corporation, et al
as 16-80176
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JACQUELINE ALEXANDER, TIM ALEXANDER, VICTORIA ANTHONY and others
Petitioner - Respondent:
JULIE FETTERS
Defendant - Petitioner:
BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER ESSURE, INC. and others
Jesus Abad et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2016cv05013
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jesus Abad, Ken Solorio, Julie Solorio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Durability Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2016md02743
Defendant:
Limber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Durability Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation and Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
In Re:
In Re: Lumber Liquidators Chinese-Manufactured Flooring Durability Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Plaintiff:
Logan Perel, Christopher Manzo, Karen Hotaling and others
Interested Party:
Diana Cantu-Guerrero and Brice M. Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jesus Abad et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as CAC/2:15-cv-03795
Plaintiff:
Jesus Abad , Ken Solorio , Julie Solorio and others
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Daniel Borden, Sr. v. R. Gautier, et al
as 10-17822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL F. BORDEN, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
R. GAUTIER, R. HITCHCOCK, S. GLEN and others
Borden v. Gautier
as 2:2010cv02435
Defendant:
R. Gautier, R. Hitchcock, S. Glen and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel F. Borden, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
