Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Hines v. Calif Dept. of Corr and Rehab et al
as 3:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Jaffomo, Inc., Saff MD Inc (Beerman), Tatina Klmo and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hines v. Tatiana Kline & Assoc. et al
as 3:2019cv00126
Defendant:
Conrep Doctors Jaffms, Tatiana Kline & Assoc., Muuron Pelton and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hines v. Brown et al
as 3:2018cv02310
Defendant:
P4 Cop, SDPD Homicide, Pelton and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hines v. Internal Affairs et al
as 3:2018cv00849
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Internal Affairs, Edward Kenny Costrares, Sr., Mr. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. California Dept. of Corr. Internal Affairs et al
as 3:2010cv00862
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
California Dept. of Corr. Internal Affairs and Florence Arizona I6I/I6I/SSU c/os
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mr. James Lynn Hines v. Mcenroe et al
as 2:2010cv01566
Defendant:
Capt. Dan Hagon, Capt. Martinca, Mcenore and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. James Lynn Hines
Hines v. Toers-Bijns et al
as 3:2008cv01330
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
Toers-Bijns, John Ontiveros, Dora B. Schriro and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Correctional Officer Union et al
as 2:2008cv00654
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Union, Arizona Peace Officer Association Union, CCPOA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Hagen et al
as 3:2008cv00555
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Dan Hagen, Jaffe Inc, Tim Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Hagen et al
as 3:2008cv00446
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Dan Hagen, Jaffe Inc, Tim Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
