Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Hines v. Toers-Bijns et al
as 3:2008cv01330
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
Toers-Bijns, John Ontiveros, Dora B. Schriro and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Hagen et al
as 3:2008cv00555
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Dan Hagen, Jaffe Inc, Tim Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Hagen et al
as 3:2008cv00446
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Dan Hagen, Jaffe Inc, Tim Dougherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Ruiz
as 3:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Pierson et al
as 3:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Eric S Pierson, Appeals Unit Administrator, Ontiveros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2007cv02372
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Maricopa County, Peace Officer Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Pierson et al
as 3:2007cv02371
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Eric S Pierson, Ontiveros, California Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Carillo
as 3:2007cv02325
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
D Carillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. San Diego Corrections
as 3:2007cv02241
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
San Diego Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Correctional Community Supervision et al
as 3:2007cv02002
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Correctional Community Supervision, South Mountain Police Precinct and Wardens of Florence State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
