Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Hines v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2007cv02372
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
County of San Diego, Maricopa County, Peace Officer Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Pierson et al
as 3:2007cv02371
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Eric S Pierson, Ontiveros, California Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Lynn Hines v. Union of Calif, Ariz and Missouri Dept of Corrections Personnel
as 2:2007cv08014
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Union of Calif, Ariz and Missouri Dept of Corrections Personnel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Hines v. Carillo
as 3:2007cv02325
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
D Carillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Lynn Hines v. John Ontlveros et al
as 2:2007cv08009
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
John Ontlveros, Ortiz and Edward K. Contraress
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Hines v. San Diego Corrections
as 3:2007cv02241
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
San Diego Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Lynn Hines v. Ruiz
as 2:2007cv07175
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
James Lynn Hines v. ASPC Florence
as 2:2007cv07185
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
ASPC Florence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Hines v. Correctional Community Supervision et al
as 3:2007cv02002
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Correctional Community Supervision, South Mountain Police Precinct and Wardens of Florence State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Pico et al
as 3:2007cv01963
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Greg Pico, Siefert, Tom Metzger-Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
