Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Hines v. San Diego Parole Department
as 2:2007cv00943
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
San Diego Parole Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv00895
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
Johnson and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Lynn Hines v. Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv02945
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
Johnson and The Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. Johnson
as 3:2007cv00699
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
Johnson and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2007cv00697
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
San Diego County, Maricopa County, Medical and Psych Network and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Williams et al
as 3:2007cv00698
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
The Williams, The Jensens, The Piersons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. Bakersfeild, Phoenix
as 2:2007cv00789
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
Bakersfeild, Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. Napalitano
as 2:2007cv00713
Petitioner:
James Lynn Hines
Respondent:
Janet Napalitano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hines v. State of California et al
as 3:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
State of California, State of Arizona, Sugiyama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Lynn Hines v. Jaquelyn Hissong et al
as 2:2007cv01783
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Jacquelyn Hissong, Barbara Hanna, Julie Hissong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
