Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Couto v. Kelley et al
as 9:2022cv80905
Plaintiff:
Jahira M Couto
Defendant:
James M Kelley, William Bradley, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kelley v. State of California et al
as 5:2018cv04812
Plaintiff:
James M Kelley
Defendant:
State of California and JPMorgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James Kelley v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al
as 17-15489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., DBA JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A and WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK
James Kelley, et al v. Rambus, Inc., et al
as 08-17720
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. KELLEY, MIKI W. LARSSON and DOUGLAS B. KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
RAMBUS, INC., PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, GEOFFREY TATE and others
Defendant:
JOHN DANFORTH, KEVIN KENNEDY, CHARLES GESCHKE and others
Jage v. Saffa et al
as 1:2008cv05647
Plaintiff:
Mary Roma Jage
Defendant:
Ronald J. Saffa, Trust Company of Oklahoma, James M. Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wallace et al v. Kelley et al
as 4:2008mc00019
Plaintiff:
Stephen P Wallace and Edith L Jackson
Defendant:
James M Kelley, Joan Godlove, Michael Freeman and others
Wallace, et al v. Saffa, et al
as 07-10741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN P WALLACE, An Individual and Vested beneficiary of the Lorice T Wallace Trusts and Family LP and all those similarly situated on behalf of Lisa F Wallace and LISA F WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD J SAFFA, An Individual, JAMES C MILTON, An Individual, JAMES E POE, An Individual and others
Appellant:
EDITH L JACKSON
Kelley et al v. Rambus, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv01238
Plaintiff:
James M Kelley, Miki W. Larsson and Douglas B. Kelley
Defendant:
Rambus, Inc., Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP, Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
