Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Evans Delva and others
Defendant:
S. Thomas Anderson, Joann Garcia Camacho, Melanie Mendiola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nooner v. Bryant et al
as 1:2019cv01014
Defendant:
Stacey Pectol, J. Leon Holmes, Sue Newberry and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Miller et al
as 4:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Harry F Barnes, Eastern District of Arkansas, James R Marschewjki and others
Petitioner:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nooner v. Miller et al
as 6:2019cv06116
Respondent:
Judge J. Leon Holmes, Judge Kristine G. Baker, Judge James M. Moody, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ashley v. Moody et al
as 4:2018cv00497
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Defendant:
James M Moody, Jr and James M Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley v. Moody
as 4:2018cv00482
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Defendant:
James M Moody, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
