Cases 1 - 10 of 15
TAYLOR et al v. SHIVELY et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW TAYLOR
Defendant:
LESLIE C. SHIVELY, ROBERT PIGMAN, MARY MARGARET LLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Rucker v. Eric Severson, et al
as 23-1666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC T. RUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC J. SEVERSON, LIEUTENANT SHALLOW, JAMES MATTHEWS and others
Christopher Goodvine v. Eric Severson, et al
as 22-1992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GOODVINE
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC J. SEVERSON, WAUKESHA COUNTY, WISCONSIN, WELLPATH HEALTH SERVICES, also known as Wellpath, LLC and others
Clayborne v. Zerbst et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jack A Clayborne
Defendant:
Nurse Zerbst, Doctor Brown, James Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucente v. Eiecman
as 3:2021cv00725
Defendant:
Eiecman and Dr Eiceman
Plaintiff:
James Matthew Lucente
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAUDILL v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW CAUDILL
Defendant:
ADAMS, RICHARD BROWN, J. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAUDILL v. MYERS
as 2:2020cv00255
Plaintiff:
JAMES MATTHEW CAUDILL
Defendant:
DENNIS MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Giese et al
as 2:2020cv00493
Defendant:
CO Washington, Angela Wallenhaupt, Lt Salsbury and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Omar Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILKINS et al v. SANOFI CORPORATION
as 4:2020cv00051
Plaintiff:
DARLENE COOKINGHAM, JOHN CORTINA, THOMAS STANZIANO and others
Defendant:
SANOFI CORPORATION and SANOFI CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
