Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Richards et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Sherma Richards, Willis Wynne, Charles Agnello and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
US v. Robert McCabe
as 22-4309
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT JAMES MCCABE
Parsa et al v. Google L.L.C. et al
as 3:2019cv02407
Defendant:
Larry Page, John Does 1-29, Sergey Brin and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus A. Parsa, Judges, Uyghurs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mazur et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11992
Plaintiff:
Paul Mess, Dennis McEntee, Pasquale Morena and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Bonano v. Shapiro et al
as 9:2016cv00844
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonano
Defendant:
Oleg Shapiro, James McCabe, Nirav Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Opalinski, et al v. Robert Half International Inc, et al
as 15-4001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID OPALINSKI and JAMES MCCABE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL INC, ROBERT HALF CORP and STEPHEN SONNENBERG
Stowell v. McCabe
as 3:2015cv08061
Plaintiff:
Brahe Joseph Stowell
Defendant:
James McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Opalinski, et al v. Robert Half Intl Inc, et al
as 12-4444
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID OPALINSKI and JAMES MCCABE
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT HALF INTL INC and ROBERT HALF CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN SONNENBERG
MCCABE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE et al
as 2:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCCABE and LORETTA MCCABE
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
