Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Fayed v. Winslow et al
as 4:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
David Winslow and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Fayed v. Warden San Quentin State Prison
as 22-99010
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
James Fayed v. USDC-SAC
as 22-70062
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JAMES MICHAEL FAYED, KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, California Department of Correctiona and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
James Michael Fayed v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2022cv01303
Petitioner:
James Michael Fayed
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom, Office of the Attorney General for the State of California and Los Angeles County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fayed v. Newsom et al
as 4:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Office of the Attorney General for the State of California and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Fayed v. Allison, et al.
as 2:2021cv02141
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison and County of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fayed v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv08912
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
Warden Kathleen Allison and County of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Fayed v. Allison et al
as 2:2021cv02041
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fayed v. Allison, et al
as 4:2021cv08206
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. James Fayed
as 08-50367
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
