Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Adams v. US
as 23-2269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES M. ADAMS, JAMES R. ALLEN, LOUIS C. ATKINS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Allen v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv15578
Plaintiff:
James R Allen and James Allen
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Koopmann v. US
as 21-1746
Plaintiff:
EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, JAMES H. BIESTEK, ROBERT L. BEAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROYALL, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv09367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Koopmann v. US
as 21-1329
Plaintiff:
EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, JAMES H. BIESTEK, ROBERT L. BEAVIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM C. BRASHEAR and WILLIAM KOOPMANN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Allen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02639
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James R. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathew Trollope v. Department of Child Support Services et al
as 2:2018cv09220
Defendant:
Tari L. Cody, Contractor Marcus Mitchell, Contractor Ventura County Child Support Services and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew J. Trollope
Petitioner:
Contractor Ventura County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01357
Plaintiff:
James R. Allen
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv30925
Plaintiff:
James R. Allen
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
as 1:2014cv03838
Plaintiff:
K. Wendell Lewis , Darrell L. Abby , Jack L. Abernathy, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation , Sally Quillian Yates, Eric Holder, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1303
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
