Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Abulkhair v. The Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 1:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Assem A. Abulkhair
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller, III, James B. Comey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Smith et al v. RPA Energy, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01254
Plaintiff:
James Smith and Tylar Spencer
Defendant:
RPA Energy, Inc., Brian Trombino and Adam Bashe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Smith v. United States of America
as 24-389
Petitioner:
JAMES SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. Kuhn et al
as 3:2023cv01566
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Williams
Defendant:
Nicholas Kuhn, James Smith, Timothy Speer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Carlton James Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Discount Power, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
Discount Power, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv10299
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv06844
Plaintiff:
James Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
