Cases 1 - 10 of 35
STILES et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20059
Plaintiff:
JAMES STILES and RUTH STILES
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STILES et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2021cv13803
Plaintiff:
JAMES STILES and RUTH STILES
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STILES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99529
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES STILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stile v. United States of America
as 9:2020cv00368
Respondent:
United States of America and The Northern District of New York Probation
Petitioner:
James Stile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STILES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv40046
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES STILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stile v. Berryhill
as 19-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Stile
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
US v. Stile
as 19-1408
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Interested Party:
E.W. MOORE & SON PHARMACY and HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Stile v. Somerset County, et al
as 19-1220
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS GARNETT, Corrections Officer, KEITH PLOURD, Corrections Officer, TRACY MARTIN, Corrections Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES STILE
Defendant:
MAINE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MAINE and WAYNE KLINE, Deputy Sheriff
Stile v. Merlak et al
as 4:2018cv00858
Petitioner:
James Stile
Respondent:
Steven Merlak and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stile v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv01824
Plaintiff:
James Stile
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
