Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Conley v. Scott et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04237
Defendant: Grace B Hou, Shan Jumper, Eric Kunkel and others
Plaintiff: Gregory Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nash v. Dimas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04121
Defendant: . McCurry, Captain . Pennock, Eric Kunkel and others
Plaintiff: Dennis E Nash, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powers v. Hou et al
as 4:2019cv04119
Defendant: Sharon Coleman, Gregg Scott, Aramark, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Powers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Dimas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04079
Plaintiff: Jerry L Gates
Defendant: Attorney Greg Scott, Sharon Coleman, Eric Kunkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermaine Carpenter v. James Dimas, et al
as 18-2418
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERMAINE D. CARPENTER
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES T. DIMAS, GREGG SCOTT, SHAN JUMPER and others
Johnson v. Dimas
as 2:2018cv02180
Petitioner: Gregory A Johnson
Undetermined: Habeas Attorney General
Respondent: James T Dimas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Racanelli v. James Dimas, et al
as 18-1709
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH R. RACANELLI
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES T. DIMAS, GREGG SCOTT, SHAN JUMPER and others
Willis v. Dimas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv04232
Plaintiff: Maceo G Willis, Jr
Defendant: James T Dimas, Gregg Scott, W Pennock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04175
Plaintiff: Phillip Sanchez
Defendant: James T Dimas, Herbert Caskey, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry McCabe v. Hugo Chaviano, et al
as 17-2180
Plaintiff - Appellant: JERRY L. MCCABE
Defendant - Appellee: HUGO CHAVIANO and JAMES T. DIMAS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?