Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brown v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Leroy L. Brown
Defendant:
D.E. Smith, H.C. Taylor, C.C. Barnhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Johnson
as 3:2019cv00452
Plaintiff:
Greg Stevens
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Will Barham, Office of 5th J D C District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Painters District Council No. 58 et al v. Superior Building Group, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00829
Plaintiff:
Painters District Council No. 58 , Gregg Smith , St. Louis Painters Pension Trust and others
Defendant:
Superior Building Group, LLC , Superior Building Group, Ca, LP , Superior Building Group Management Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ward v. Smoke et al
as 2:2014cv00675
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Ward
Defendant:
Stephanie Daniels Smoke , David Bowen , James Trey Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Treis v. Google, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00796
Plaintiff:
James Treis
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
In Re: Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation
as 1:2012md02358
In Re:
Google Inc. Cookie Placement Consumer Privacy Litigation
Defendant:
Google LLC
Petitioner:
Prescott Lovern
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Jeffery N. Luthi, Matthew Soble, Lourdes Villegas and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Treis v. Google, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00433
Plaintiff:
James Treis
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Patrick Grider, et al v. City of Auburn, AL, et al
as 11-12099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK JAMES GRIDER, DANIEL JOSEPH GRIDER and THE FOURTH QUARTER, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AUBURN, AL, WILLIAM HAM, JR., JAMES TREY NEAL, III and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
