Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Connie Jerome, et al v. Robert Barnack, et al
as 21-16676
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONNIE JEROME and JAMES VAN DYKE
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT SCOTT BARNACK
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, Sacramento and DOUGLAS M. WHATLEY, Trustee
Lavender v. Driveline Retail Merchandising Inc.
as 5:2019mc80155
Plaintiff:
Shirley Lavender
Defendant:
Driveline Retail Merchandising Inc.
Petitioner:
James Van Dyke
Van Dyke v. Driveline Retail Merchandising, In.c
as 3:2019mc80154
Defendant:
Driveline Retail Merchandising, In.c
Petitioner:
James Van Dyke
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Van Dyke et al v. Balance Point Retirement Analytics LLC
as 2:2018cv02531
Defendant:
Balance Point Retirement Analytics LLC
Plaintiff:
James Van Dyke and Connie Jerome
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Jose Torres, et al v. Simpatico, Inc., et al
as 14-1567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Torres, Guadalupe Clemente, Luz Walker and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Simpatico, Inc., Stratus Franchising, LLC, Peter Frese, Jr., individually and others
Torres et al v. Simpatico, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv02373
Plaintiff:
Jose Torres , Guadalupe Clemente , Luz Walker and others
Defendant:
Simpatico, Inc., Stratus Franchising, LLC, Peter Frese, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Salas et al v. International Union of Operating Engineers et al
as 2:2012cv10506
Defendant:
Mickey J Adams, Paul Von Berg, Dan Billy and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chamberlain, John Paxin, Mario Salas and others
Finn Pette et al v. International Union of Operating Engineers
as 2:2012cv09324
Plaintiff:
Anne Brophy, James McLaughlin, John Crooks and others
Defendant:
Cornel Sneekes, Patrick L Sink, Kuba J Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
