Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Mulero v. Walsh et al
as 3:2015cv01406
Plaintiff:
Bernie Mulero
Defendant:
Patrick James Walsh, Ronald Sheposh, Gary Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Burlison et al
as 3:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
William Warren Booth
Defendant:
Eileen Burlison and James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv05759
Plaintiff:
Brenda Anderson and Shameeka Anderson
Defendant:
City of New York, John Does 1-2 and Detective James Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dekom v. New York
as 13-2773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton
Defendant - Appellee:
New York, Andrew Cuomo, Governor, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Roland III v. McMayle et al
as 1:2012cv06331
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Roland III
Defendant:
McMayle, Taft, Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06625
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Myrick v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv02411
Defendant:
City of New York, Prabhjot Sekhon and James Walsh
The Names John And Jane Doe Being Fictitious, As The True Names Are Presently Unknown:
John Doe and Jane Doe #1-13
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Myrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dekom v. New York
as 12-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton
Defendant - Appellee:
New York, Andrew Cuomo, Governor, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Dekom et al v. New York et al
as 2:2012cv01318
Defendant:
Evelyn Aquila, William Biamonte, Andrew Cuomo and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Dekom, Kenneth Jacoby and Robert Pendleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
