Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Weems v. Lumpkin
as 22-50794
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ruthen James Weems, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Weems v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00998
Petitioner:
Ruthen James Weems, III
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruthen Weems, III v. Brent Stroman, et al
as 18-50170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUTHEN JAMES WEEMS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT CONLEY, JUAN AVILA, PAUL SCRIVNER and others
Daniel Weems v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-50851
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JAMES WEEMS
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Weems v. State of Texas
as 6:2017cv00049
Respondent:
State of Texas
Petitioner:
Ruthen James Weems, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruthen Weems, III v. Brent Stroman, et al
as 16-50943
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUTHEN JAMES WEEMS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT STROMAN, Waco Chief of Police, PARNELL MCNAMARA, McLennan County Sheriff, OFFICER 1 and others
Weems v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00687
Plaintiff:
James Weems
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, Parker Hannifin , Honeywell International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weems v. Amorosia et. al.
as 6:2016cv00012
Defendant:
Jim Amorosia and Motel 6 Operating, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Ruthen James Weems, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2016cv00032
Defendant:
Jim Amorosia and Motel 6 Operating, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Ruthen James Weems, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Weems v. Stroman et al
as 6:2015cv00332
Defendant:
Charles W. McDonald, Parnell McNamara, Abelino Reyna and others
Plaintiff:
Ruthen James Weems, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
