Cases 11 - 20 of 129
James Hall v. Dorain Davis, et al
as 23-3307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
DORAIN DAVIS, RASHAUNDA BOARD DAVIS, JUDGE ALISON M. BREAUX and others
James Williams, IVIn re: James Williams, IV
as 23-3236
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES WILLIAMS, IV
Respondent:
SUMMIT BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE CENTER
James Freese v. Gary Miniard
as 23-1249
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM FREESE
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY MINIARD, Warden
James Medina-Rodriguez v. Robert Crompton
as 23-1172
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM MEDINA-RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. ROBERT M. CROMPTON
Williams v. Summit Behavioral Healthcare
as 2:2023cv00576
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Summit Behavioral Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Williams, IVIn re: James Williams, IV
as 23-3118
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES WILLIAMS, IV
Respondent:
GREENE COUNTY, OH ADULT DETENTION CENTER
James Williams v. Wilmington, OH Police Dept., et al
as 23-3028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAMS, IV
Defendant / Appellee:
WILMINGTON, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF THE WILMINGTON, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT, RALPH D. FIZER, JR., Clinton County, OH Sheriffs Department and others
Williams v. Sheriff, Greene County Adult Detention Center
as 2:2022cv04205
Petitioner:
James Williams, IV and James Williams, IV, r
Respondent:
Sheriff, Greene County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Hayes et al
as 2:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
James Williams, IV and James Williams, IV, r
Defendant:
David Hayes, Suzzane Schmidt, Michelle Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Beavercreek Police Cheif et al
as 2:2022cv04022
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Beavercreek Police Cheif, Beavercreek Police Dept., Sgt. Amatos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
