Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cousik, et al v. Winters, et al
as 24-1124
Plaintiff:
TARIN ALLEN, TEJAS COUSIK, JAKE DOUGLAS and others
Defendant:
JOSHUA WINTERS, Aurora Police Officer, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO, AUSTIN RUNYON, Aurora Police Officer and others
Cousik et al v. Phelan et al
as 1:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
Tejas Cousik, Tarin Allen, Jake Douglas and others
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, Patrick Phelan, City of Aurora, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sivatia et al v. Fox et al
as 2:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
Atonio Sivatia and Nonnie L. Masaniai Pea
Defendant:
Ammon Fox, James Williams, Nick Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saenz v. City of Lovington et al
as 2:2021cv00687
Plaintiff:
Mary Saenz
Defendant:
City of Lovington, City of Lovington Police Department, Ceasar Juarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cloud v. USA et al
as 1:2019cv03684
Plaintiff:
Wind Cloud
Defendant:
James Williams and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel Acres Town of et al v. Williams et al
as 5:2016cv01242
Plaintiff:
Bethel Acres Town of , Bethel Acres Baseball Softball Organization and Bethel Little League Football
Defendant:
James Williams and Tina Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Howse v. Torres et al
as 2:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
James William Howse
Defendant:
Ron Torres, FNU Torres and Fnu Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mondragon v. Thompson, et al
as 06-2358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MONDRAGON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WILLIAM THOMPSON, Probation Officer, State of New Mexico, in his individual capacity and JOSE LEON FLORES, Supervisor, New Mexico Department of Corrections, Probation & Parole Division, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
