Cases 31 - 40 of 152
James William Corbin III v. California Dept. of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv03940
Respondent:
Attorney General of Calif., California Dept. of Corrections and California Dept. of Justice
Petitioner:
James William Corbin, III
James William Myers v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02534
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
James Williams Myers
Thomas v. USA et al
as 2:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Jayaton-Kerry Edward Thomas
Defendant:
USA, CEO of USA, Dale A. Drozd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benny Abucejo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05666
Plaintiff:
Benny Abucejo, Mario Aguilar, Phillip Alaniz, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Neal, et al v. California City, et al
as 1:2014cv00269
Plaintiff:
James William Neal, III and Cordelia Neal
Defendant:
California City , California City Police Department , Christopher Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Garwood
as 3:2014cv00390
Defendant:
Mark Garwood, Allan Bortel, Richard Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Williams v. Knipp
as 3:2013cv02690
Petitioner:
Bobby James Williams
Respondent:
William Knipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Brammer v. Amy Miller
as 2:2013cv07368
Petitioner:
James Williams Brammer
Respondent:
Ms Amy Miller
Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan et al v. Silicon Valley Glass, Inc.
as 3:2013cv04600
Plaintiff:
Northern California Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Pension Plan , District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund , Glaziers Individual Account Retirement Plan and others
Defendant:
Silicon Valley Glass, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Williams v. Long
as 3:2013cv02070
Petitioner:
James Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
David Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
