Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Williams v. Foster et al
as 1:2019cv00055
Respondent:
Charles County Detention Center, Maryland Attorney General and Director Brandon Foster
Petitioner:
James Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trustees of the Heating, Piping and Refrigeration Pension Fund et al v. Clean Air Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03690
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Heating, Piping and Refrigeration Pension Fund , Trustees of the Heating, Piping and Refrigeration Medical Fund , Trustees of the Heating, Piping and Refrigeration Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Clean Air Mechanical, Inc., James William Hardesty, Jr. and Clean Air Building Services, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Williams v. Terry
as 8:2016cv02829
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Kevin Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Rice et al
as 1:2015cv01509
Petitioner:
James Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
Susan Rice and Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv03115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Waters v. USA - 2255
as 8:2013cv02765
Plaintiff:
James William Waters
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Harrison et al
as 8:2013cv02546
Plaintiff:
James Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Dale R. Harrison and Rex W. Coffey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Professional Insurance Company
as 8:2013cv01320
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Professional Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tayman v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02592
Plaintiff:
James William Tayman
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Williams v. United States of America
as 8:2011cv00950
Petitioner:
Harry James Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
