Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Williams et al v. Johnson et al
as 6:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Brandy Williams and James Williams
Defendant:
Robert L. Johnson, LCJ Logistics, Inc, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Williams v. Weaver et al
as 5:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
John James Williams
Defendant:
FNU Weaver, Warden Luke Pettigrew, Joseph Harp Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Stem et al
as 5:2020cv01262
Defendant:
FNU Kembrel, Patty Stem and FNU Weaver
Plaintiff:
John James Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicks et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Willie Nicks , James Allison , Olawate Aberibigbe and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc., EMP LSO Holding Corporation and Lone Star Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bethel Acres Town of et al v. Williams et al
as 5:2016cv01242
Plaintiff:
Bethel Acres Town of , Bethel Acres Baseball Softball Organization and Bethel Little League Football
Defendant:
James Williams and Tina Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santini et al v. Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00568
Plaintiff:
Jose Santini , Luz N Santini , Marcia Schlissel and others
Defendant:
Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc , Physicians Dispensing RX Inc , Eli Lilly Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. McDonald et al
as 4:2013cv00491
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Bruce McDonald, James William Bowling and Rooster and Roses Sports Pub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Sargent v. Rudek
as 5:2010cv01231
Petitioner:
James William Sargent
Respondent:
James Rudek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lovelace v Dinwiddie
as 6:2007cv00224
Plaintiff:
James William Lovelace
Defendant:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
